When you need accuracy the most, the greatest gaming mouse doesn’t lose it. You need a mouse that matches your pace and offers the accuracy you require, whether you’re playing fast-paced first-person shooter games, planning precise strategies, or trying to solve a timed puzzle. The best mouse provide solid clicks, and if you choose to go wireless, they need to be charged as soon as possible.
You probably haven’t yet found the appropriate mouse for you if you prefer a controller to a keyboard and mouse combination when playing PC games(opens in new tab). Your selected genre will undoubtedly play a significant role, but when it comes to speed and accuracy, the mouse will always reign supreme. In either case, having a quality gaming mouse on hand is always a smart idea in case controller stick drift(opens in new tab) starts to set in.
A top-notch gaming mouse is durable, offers excellent ergonomics, and has functions tailored to your favourite games. The ideal mouse for MOBA players will be loaded with buttons and heavier than the ideal lightweight mouse(opens in new tab) that an FPS player might like. Today’s top wireless mice(opens in new tab) are also just as accurate as their wired counterparts, so if you want to be untethered, these are definitely worth taking into consideration. There is undoubtedly a mouse out there that is ideal for you, whether you prefer them to be wired or wireless, light or heavy, or loaded with customizable buttons.
We’ve uncovered several excellent budget gaming mice, proving that the finest gaming mouse doesn’t have to be expensive. Over the years, I’ve personally tested hundreds of gaming mice, and my team and I have narrowed them down to the selection listed below. The greatest gaming mice are those listed below; invest your time on them. The top gaming keyboards (opens in new tab) go well with the mouse below if you want to complete your setup. Otherwise, your performance will be a little uneven.
1 Razer DeathAdder V2
The Deathadder Elite, one of the greatest gaming mice, has been available since 2016 in a variety of forms. The Razer Deathadder V2 builds upon everything we love about the Deathadder Elite.
The Focus+ Optical Sensor, which is also found in the superb Razer Viper Ultimate Wireless, is the most noticeable upgrade (opens in new tab). I’ll explain why I was more impressed by the subtler modifications Razer made to the V2 in a moment. The scroll wheel is the first. The new design from Razer is called “Instinctive Scroll Wheel Tactility,” which sounds absurd, but the results are excellent. The tightness is just ideal. You won’t accidentally scroll too frequently because the turn is smooth yet you can still feel each notch of the turn.
It may seem unimportant, but the fact that Razer is utilising a new wire with the same ludicrous moniker of “Speedflex Cable” turns out to be a big matter. Since I’ve been using the Deathadder (the Expert) for so long, my only concern is that, depending on how it’s positioned on my desk, the stiffer wire can occasionally pull the mouse to one side. The V2’s wire is the most flexible I’ve found on a gaming mouse, so even if you’re careless with wire management like I am, it won’t likely affect how your mouse moves.
Additionally, the left and right mouse buttons are stronger than the Elite. They employ an infrared light beam to register clicks rather than a mechanical mechanism, thus they should provide fewer false clicks, have less delay, and last longer. Compared to the 50 million clicks for the Deathadder Elite, Razer estimates that they will survive 70 million clicks. They felt as responsive as I could possibly require and I never clicked incorrectly, despite the fact that I am unable to determine how accurate that figure is. I never had to worry about unintentionally shooting a shot when playing Escape from Tarkov or Fortnite.
The sensor is Razer’s “party trick,” and its specifications are included in parenthesis for comparison with those of the Deathadder Elite. It tracks at speeds of up to 650 inches per second (450) and 20,000 DPI/CPI (16,000), and its resolution accuracy is 99.6%. (99.4 percent). Those higher numbers might or might not mean anything to you because they won’t have a significant impact on performance on a daily basis. How frequently should you exceed 16,000 DPI/CPI? hardly ever.
The left and right mouse buttons, on the other hand, are a little fragile, continuing a trend in more recent Razer mice. When you click them on straight, they seem good, even strong, but the smallest sideways pressure causes them to waggle off-center. It gives me the impression that they wouldn’t be able to withstand much damage, such as if you put the V2 in a bag before rushing out the door. Although it’s a small complaint, I had the same issue with the Viper Ultimate Wireless, and I hope Razer can fix it soon. It lessens the overall strong build.
2 Logitech G203 Lightsync
You’re not alone if the Logitech G203 Lightsync seems familiar to you. Despite the fact that this mouse is relatively new, it functions almost exactly the same as the G203 Prodigy that came before it.
The G203 Lightsync belongs to a fiercely contested class of cheap gaming mice. Razer is the biggest threat to it, offering the Deathadder Essential, Basilisk Essential, and Viper Mini at this price range or close to it. The G203 Lightsync, however, is strong enough to stand on its own. With a straightforward design that only includes the necessities, it capitalises on a subtle aesthetic flare that isn’t as strong elsewhere.
The G203 Lightsync is a wired mouse; if you’re looking for a wireless mouse, look for Lightspeed. Instead, Lightsync designates how well this mouse works with the Logitech G software and RGB lighting system, which can synchronise RGB lighting effects across all compatible Logitech products. The fact that non-Lightsync goods can also interact with such app to varied degrees is somewhat perplexing.
The thin strip that runs across the back of the palm rest contains the three lighting zones, with the logo above matching the colour of the centre RGB lighting zone. While independent control of the logo itself would have been wonderful, the option does enable stunning tri-color gradient effects that move from one side of the mouse to the other.
You can create something rather lovely for $40 if you combine this with the G203 Lightsync’s slightly modified white and grey choice (instead of the white and black option previously offered with the Prodigy). Yes, the addition of a grey scroll wheel reservation as opposed to the prior model’s black one is the only other distinction between the G203 Lightsync and its predecessor.
While I can’t predict how it will look in five years, I can tell you that it looks absolutely lovely right out of the box because I chose the white hue for the test unit for this review.
Expect the G203 Lightsync to have a nearly ambidextrous design, with two buttons located underneath where your right thumb’s pad would normally be. The Logitech G203’s otherwise universal design has an unexpected shortcoming in that these aren’t removable or switchable to the other side. Nevertheless, it has a straightforward design that Logitech appropriately refers to as “tried and true.”
With the exception of the largest 4K monitors, the G203’s unidentified “gaming-grade” sensor’s 200–8,000 DPI range should be more than sufficient. However, in that case, you might want to look for something a little grander than the G203. The sensor performs flawlessly in mouse sensor tests and is more than adequate for fair and reliable gaming.
With each iteration of the G203, Logitech is unwilling to reinvent the budget-conscious gaming mouse, which may indicate a calm confidence in the features it’s bringing to the more cheap end of its extensive mouse lineup. Although the G203 Lightsync’s adjustments are minor, they may make for a materially brief evaluation. Nevertheless, we aren’t eager to remove it from our list of the best gaming mice just yet.
3 Razer Naga Pro
For years, the Razer Naga Trinity has been our top pick for MMO/MOBA games on our list of the best gaming mice, but the Razer Naga Pro is the new kid on the block. For Razer HyperSpeed Wireless and Bluetooth connectivity, the Naga Pro does away with the wire. Additionally, it detects optical mouse switches and the excessive 20,000 DPI sensor.
Naga Pro’s overall style is similar to the Trinity, but it has more weight to account for the additional technology. The Naga Pro is 7mm wider and 117g heavier than the Trinity, but it glides over most surfaces easily because of its 100% PTFE feet. It takes some getting used to the larger mouse as well; my lengthy hands have to adopt a full palm grip. However, it is simpler to grip onto thanks to the curved mouse buttons and a rest for my ring finger. Thumb and pinky grips made of textured rubber are also beneficial.
I like Razer’s optical-mechanical switches since they are extremely quick and use light instead of mechanics to register clicks. The switches have a lifespan of 70 million clicks and are sturdy, but the Naga Pro also contains a tonne of other buttons. You can remap the 2, 6, and 12 buttons on the three interchangeable plates however you choose.
In Razer Synapse, remapping buttons is a simple point-and-click process. You may alter DPI levels, polling rates, lift-offs, battery management, and of course, Razer Chroma lighting. You can also configure anything from simple keyboard shortcut bindings to complicated gaming macros.
Obviously, if your experience is jerky, none of this matters. The HyperSpeed Wireless, thankfully, does not let down. I was really impressed with vsynctester.com(opens in new tab), which I used to swiftly measure lag. The speed of the cursor’s response to your mouse movements is measured during the test. The wireless connection of the Naga Pro managed 6.1ms while I was recording 6ms in wired mode, a difference of 0.1ms. Only a keen eye would detect the 4-6ms slower Bluetooth in normal use.
The Razer Focus+ 20,000 DPI sensor with 650 IPS tracking has also been updated for the Naga Pro’s optical sensor. I can only print at 8,000 DPI, which is significantly more than most people will ever require.
Battery life is a valid concern given all this scientific wizardry, but Razer’s claim of a 150-hour battery life holds true. I’ve been using this review unit for the past week, using it an average of 14 hours per day, and the battery is still only around 35% full. That required a lot of effort, gaming, and switching between Bluetooth and wireless.
To be quite honest, except from the absence of a dock, I have no serious complaints with the Naga Pro. The speed, accuracy, and versatility of this new Razer Naga Pro will appeal to the discriminating, cable-averse multi-genre master.
4 SteelSeries Prime Wireless Pro
How much the new Steelseries Prime Wireless Gaming Mouse resembles the Razer Viper Ultimate is fascinating (opens in new tab). It’s a straightforward, high-performance device made to blend with your hand and transform you into the FPS god you’ve always imagined yourself to be.
The Prime Wireless immediately gave me the impression that it was made specifically for my hand. According to Steelseries, to create the ideal shape and weight that feels like an extension of your arm, they collaborated with many esports professionals. The product finally lives up to the anticipation.
Right-handed people with strong claw and fingertip grips are the target audience for the Prime Wireless. The entire mouse appears to be softly sloping to the right, cradling in your palm for a secure hold. The ABS material used to make the body features a matte finish and a micro-textured surface that feels both slick and gripping. It is slightly heavier than the Viper Ultimate at 80g, but it is scarcely substantial.
The mouse buttons climb higher toward your index finger and taper off under your middle finger, while the thumb well curves inward. The buttons feel simpler to click due to this slight slant. There is hardly any travel required to reach the thumb buttons because they are placed just slightly above where your thumb rests. I could live with it even though I do wish they were a little bit more front so I wouldn’t have to crook my thumb as much to press the rear button.
The internal rechargeable battery in the Prime Wireless is rated to last 100 hours on a single charge. That is more than a week of typical use. To be clear, those figures are only possible when the mouse is operating in High-efficiency mode, which reduces several features like the RGB to conserve power. You should keep it in performance mode while gaming because it will consume the battery far more quickly—about 40 hours in testing. Fortunately, the Prime Wireless has a convenient quick charge feature that makes charging a breeze.
The Prime Wireless is a pure delight to use for gaming. The mouse glides effortlessly because of its large, lightweight PTFE skates, especially considering that there isn’t any irritating wire to restrict your movement. With a 1,000Hz polling rate and the TrueMove Air 18,000 CPI optical sensor, 1-1 tracking is accurate and quick. Inconveniently, changing CPI sensitivity necessitates raising the mouse to access the button underneath, which isn’t practical in the midst of battle.
The primary clickers up top feature exclusive Prestige OM magnetic switches, which are pleasant and snappy. They use a mix of magnets and lasers to operate at “quantum speeds.” The buttons are made to last longer than most—over 100 million clicks—and feel sturdy without any wobble or sideways migration.
The Quantum 2.0 Wireless, which is delivered via a thin USB Type-C dongle, brings everything together. If your computer doesn’t have any Type-C ports, don’t worry; Steelseries includes a Type-A converter in the box. For the mouse to stay connected even if one channel is disrupted, Quantum Wireless employs a novel dual channel method. With the exception of when using the hyper-efficiency mode, the Prime displayed absolutely no detectable lag.
The Steelseries Prime Wireless is so incredibly pleasant to use for both work and gaming that I never anticipated to appreciate it. Input lag is hardly a problem, and in all honesty, modern wireless devices can hardly be distinguished from their connected equivalents. The battery life is excellent, and every wireless peripheral ought to include a quick charge feature. The Prime Wireless is a high-quality mouse that will serve you long, although it is on the pricey side at $139.
5 Razer Basilisk V3
The third version of the renowned wired rodent is represented by the new Razer Basilisk V3. It nearly has the same appearance and feel as the V2, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing. The right-handed Basilisk V3 costs $70 and features the same split mouse button, recognisable thumb paddle, and flared and textured thumb rest as the V2.
It serves as a reminder of why the Basilisk Ultimate was formerly my personal favourite mouse because it is really pleasant to grasp onto for hours at a time.
The most noticeable design modification is a blazing, 9-zone Razer Chroma lighting strip on the base, which you won’t miss. The V3 appears to be an extraterrestrial visitor ship on your desk in this comic strip. The Razer Chroma studio allows you to customise the illumination in addition to the scroll wheel and hump logo. If you’re serious about using Razer’s software.
One of the most notable features of the V3, according to Razer, is the new HyperScroll Tilt Wheel. There are two ways to utilise it: Tactile for measured, clicky scrolls, and Free Spin for effortless scrolling. The automatic mode known as Smart Reel alternates between the two modes. Long web pages and papers benefit greatly from the mouse releasing the wheel into Free Spin when it is spun faster.
When the mouse changes modes, it makes an auditory click similar to a gear shift. Unfortunately, Smart Reel is considerably too eager and would activate far too frequently, much to my annoyance. Thankfully, there is a button directly behind the scroll wheel that allows you to manually change modes. I spend a lot of time working in design applications, and while the free spin helps me navigate vast canvases more quickly, it becomes problematic when I need to zoom in and out for details.
This is made worse by the scroll acceleration feature of the V3, which increases scroll speed as the wheel is spun faster. Although your experience may differ, it’s one of those things that is probably an acquired taste. Despite how cool this new scroll wheel is, I was unable to find a use for it in games, however I’m sure some of you intelligent people will come up with some ingenious hacks.
Thankfully, the scroll wheel isn’t the focal point of the scant upgrades. Additionally, Razer has increased the Focus+ optical sensor’s resolution from an outrageous 20,000 DPI to 26,000 DPI. However, it has kept the 650 IPS.
Although I don’t know anyone who regularly plays video games at such high DPI, the Basilisk V3 is undeniably accurate, responsive, and fluid. The additional granularity that high DPI enables also contributes to its smooth tracking.
The primary mouse buttons include second-generation Razer Optical mechanical switches that are fast, responsive, and have crisp clicks. I adore the soft button grooves and the delicate smoothness that prevents fingers from slipping. We’ll have to wait and see how well the buttons hold up after a few thousand clicks, but I also noted that they are less shaky than earlier Basilisks.
The Razer Basilisk V3 is a good improvement on an already excellent mouse, enhancing certain features without diminishing others. Those upgrades are also appreciated, and I’m really impressed by how beautiful the new Chroma lighting looks. Although entertaining, the HyperScroll Tilt Wheel ultimately isn’t as handy for gaming as it is for productivity work.
Overall, I really like this new Basilisk, and it makes me eager for the Basilisk V3 Ultimate wireless. That mouse is going to be big.
6 SteelSeries Sensei 310
The Sensei 310, an improved version of this Steelseries stalwart, quietly reworked a traditional mouse. It was required. Except for the Sensei’s ambidextrous shape, almost everything has improved, and that is exactly how it should be. Despite being a few years old, this mouse is still a fantastic choice for action-packed gaming. Due to its age, it is frequently available at a reasonable price.
The Sensei is grippier and can shake off a sweaty palm thanks to a new plastic shell. Steelseries employs TrueMove3, a variant of one of the greatest gaming sensors available, to guarantee that the Sensei 310 won’t experience any tracking problems. 350 IPS and 12,000 DPI are both supported. Even though it’s a little less performance than some of the latest mice on this list, most gamers may still use it.
The Sensei 310 is a great form for left- or right-handed gamers searching for a midsized ambidextrous mouse because it fits in your hand exactly like the original Sensei. It includes identical thumb buttons on both the left and the right, which is a typical problem with ambidextrous mice since it can be too simple to mistakenly click the wrong side’s buttons as you grip the mouse with your pinky. That hasn’t occurred once in the hours that I’ve spent testing the Sensei 310.
The thumb buttons’ size and shape have also been adjusted, making it simple to press them by rocking your thumb upward while keeping them out of the way of unintentional pinky clicks.
Anyone looking for a compact, lightweight, or ambidextrous mouse should start here.
7 Logitech G Pro X Superlight
The popular Logitech G Pro Wireless is reduced in weight by 17 grammes in the Logitech G Pro X Superlight. However, judging by the Pro X Superlight, you would hardly know it. It has many characteristics with the popular and straightforward gaming mouse, the G Pro Wireless, including a nearly identical appearance.
In comparison to sleeker mouse models, the outer shell of this mouse is very prominent near the palm, providing a bit more support. The principal mouse buttons and the area beneath your thumb and pinky also have a very small shape. Overall, it has a modest design by mouse standards of today.
To achieve its rigid weight standards, the Logitech Superlight has undergone some significant alterations. It must in order to compete with its wireless competitors who are more lightweight. even a lot of the greatest wireless mice, to be honest.
The G Pro Wireless lacks the detachable thumb buttons that have almost become a trademark of the device. There are two thumb buttons on the left side that are fastened permanently in their location. That’s unfortunate for a few reasons. First off, there is a little less personalization available, though I’ll acknowledge that even with the option, the majority of people would choose the same loadout. Second, the Superlight is now only used by right-handed people due to the removal of removable switches.
The majority of the RGB lighting is also gone. Only one LED dot, which changes colour based on the CPI level specified in the Logitech G Software, is present. Given that the G Pro Wireless just includes three dots for DPI level indications and a light-up Logitech G logo—hardly a light show—it is not a huge shift from what came before it, but it is unquestionably a feature that has helped sell a tonne of other gaming mice to date.
However, the typical battery life is a respectable 70 hours despite the lack of unnecessary features. Even with RGB turned off, that’s 10 hours longer than the G Pro Wireless, proving that the two devices’ batteries have improved. In order to keep the Superlight charged, you’ll most likely connect it to a cable at least once a week in practise.
The Logitech Superlight also has several additional minor details that are nice to have. Although it has been marginally improved with a larger PTFE footprint, the underside of the mouse has undergone a modest material modification to appear more lightweight than with the G Pro Wireless. You’d be hard-pressed to see the difference between the two with a half-decent mouse mat, but the Superlight definitely moves across the surface with ease.
The praised Hero 25K sensor, which is present in all of Logitech’s newest products, is found within. What’s more to say about this one? It’s fantastic, responsive, offers an unbelievable range of CPI speeds, and in my testing using MouseTester, I didn’t find even at the maximum CPI setting a single inconsistent result or erroneous data point. Stunning as usual.
The additional expense of the lightweight variant, along with the loss of a convenient DPI switch, replaceable thumb switches, and RGB lighting, is offset by the reduction in weight of 17 grammes compared to the G Pro Wireless. But hey, if you’re the competitive sort, it might be worthwhile.